|
|
Arbitrability of dispute and International Commercial Arbitration
Svatoš, Martin ; Pauknerová, Monika (advisor) ; Kučera, Zdeněk (referee)
Arbitrability of dispute and International Commercial Arbitration - Summary Bc. Martin Svatoš The objective of this thesis is to explain the issue of arbitrability of disputes in an international commercial arbitration, especially to compare the Czech and the foreign approach. The thesis consists of three chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of arbitrability. Chapter One is introductory and defines basic terminology used in the thesis: especially the definition of arbitrability and the question of choice-law. It addresses the issue of the institution deciding the objection of arbitrability and the distinction between the subjective and objective arbitrability, too. Chapter Two concerns the subjective arbitrability. The approach of subjective arbitrability argues whether the State or state entities could be a part of arbitration agreement. However, this claim was questioned by some states and some authors. It examines relevant Czech and other legislations, especially the legislation of states with relatively hostile approach to subjective arbitrability, e.g. Iran. It concerns the old approach of Belgium, too. It presents the approach of denial of justice by several states. Finally, it provides an outline of relevant case law and illustrates the today's point of view by important award...
|
|
|
Objective arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration
Svatoš, Martin ; Pauknerová, Monika (advisor) ; Dobiáš, Petr (referee)
Objective arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration Martin Svatoš Abstract: The objective of this paper is to explain the issue of objective arbitrability of disputes in an international commercial arbitration. The approach of objective arbitrability argues what kind of disputes could be an object for an international arbitration. This paper is focused on comparing the Czech and the foreign approach. The paper consists of two main chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of arbitrability. Chapter One is introductory and defines basic terminology used in the thesis: especially the definition of arbitrability, the distinction between subjective and objective arbitrability. The question of choosing of law is mentioned, too. It outlines the main coincidences of objective arbitrability with public order and examines relevant Czech and other legislations, especially the Austrian, the German, the French or US approach. Finally, it provides an outline of relevant international conventions. Chapter Two deals with the objective arbitrability in some special law fields. It is focused on Intellectual property law, antitrust and competition law, insolvency law, on the intra-corporate disputes, on the franchisee contacts and finally on bribery and corruption. Conclusions are made in last chapter....
|
|
|
Arbitrability of dispute and International Commercial Arbitration
Svatoš, Martin ; Pauknerová, Monika (advisor) ; Kučera, Zdeněk (referee)
Arbitrability of dispute and International Commercial Arbitration - Summary Bc. Martin Svatoš The objective of this thesis is to explain the issue of arbitrability of disputes in an international commercial arbitration, especially to compare the Czech and the foreign approach. The thesis consists of three chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of arbitrability. Chapter One is introductory and defines basic terminology used in the thesis: especially the definition of arbitrability and the question of choice-law. It addresses the issue of the institution deciding the objection of arbitrability and the distinction between the subjective and objective arbitrability, too. Chapter Two concerns the subjective arbitrability. The approach of subjective arbitrability argues whether the State or state entities could be a part of arbitration agreement. However, this claim was questioned by some states and some authors. It examines relevant Czech and other legislations, especially the legislation of states with relatively hostile approach to subjective arbitrability, e.g. Iran. It concerns the old approach of Belgium, too. It presents the approach of denial of justice by several states. Finally, it provides an outline of relevant case law and illustrates the today's point of view by important award...
|
guest ::
